How much is the social maintenance fee Is it reasonable-remonstrate

How much is the social maintenance fee? Is it reasonable? Original title: social compensation fee collection standards so high why Author: Hu Yinbin Anhui and other places to accumulating fines, not only difficult to receive the good effect of population management, there may be the birth of a new forced tragedy. The day before, the Beijing Municipal People’s Government on Amending the "Beijing social compensation fee collection management approach" (Draft) the decision to start the Legislative Affairs Office of the municipal government’s official website for public comment. The draft does not meet the requirements for the birth of the third and more than three children born out of wedlock couples or third and more than three children per citizen, the birth of a child, according to the published statistics department of urban residents or rural residents per capita disposable income of 3 to 10 times of collection. According to media reports, more than 20 provinces clearly the "kids" social compensation fee standard. Many regions have adopted a multi birth and more punishment measures, and some places also take a progressive accumulation of fines. "Two children" has just landed, fines again. "Two children" dividend policy has not been fully released, when many people are still hesitant to give birth to a second child, raising cost calculation geometry, 21 provinces have clear social compensation fee collection standards in local regulations in the new building. With the population income, occupation still bounce in many areas linked charges, or even increase the penalties for more than 3 of fetal birth, let life lost track of time’. From the management level, the local government actively revised local planning regulations, the expropriation law, embodies the spirit of the rule of law, in accordance with the basic strategy of rule of law. But in "two children" and the national population policy gradually relaxed under the background of the new social compensation fee collection standards of sharp, and beyond most people’s expectations. It should be noted that local legislation should reflect the greatest policy of good faith, and should not be a tool to achieve a certain interest. Previously, the State Planning Commission submitted to the State Council for review and comments to the public the "social maintenance fee collection and Management Ordinance (Draft)" made it clear that the social compensation fee "set the annual real income is three times the highest limit, now Ordinance has not been formally introduced, but since the line around the first set of standards, and the above regulations the charging standard of the trend, policy or false start behind, still with the social compensation fee allocation. Over the years, regardless of their social security fee collection or transparency, flow problems, have been criticized. For example, bundled with public services, mandatory collection, etc.. Although the media have repeatedly called for, so far, only more than and 20 provinces to disclose the total amount of provincial level, and the expenditure is unknown. With the change of population policy, reduce the social compensation fee has become a public desire. But now, there are some places in the continuation of the progressive social support incremental approach, the intensity is not reduced, it is inevitable to allow reform discount. Anhui and other places to accumulating fines, not only difficult to receive the good effect of population management, there may be the birth of a new forced tragedy. The measures for the administration of levy recently announced the "Beijing social compensation fee" (Draft), to no more than three children bounce set "double" social compensation fee levied in terms of abandoned cumulative penalty Hao相关的主题文章: